Like my esteemed co-blogger, K.N. McBride, I am a Roman Catholic. As time goes on, I feel increasingly ambivalent about my faith.
Make no mistake, the church has a great tradition of missionary activity, ministering to the poor, overseeing effective charities, educating poverty-stricken inner city students of all faiths, and engaging in rigorous intellectual dialogue regarding doctrinal, philosophical and theological questions and how they relate to our culture. (Thomas Aquinas, Sir Thomas More, Cardinal Avery Dulles and many other deep thinkers have contributed to the rich Catholic intellectual tradition -- a tradition that seeks to probe the meaning of life, humanity and creation.)
The Catholic Mass and sacraments are powerful, deeply meaningful elements of the faith. I believe the church has helped me in my spiritual journey, as grace, faith and prayer have undoubtedly saved me from some destructive impulses that could have harmed me in the past -- especially in my younger days.
Reasonable people can disagree on whether the Catholic sacraments are based in scripture. But there is no question that some -- indeed, a considerable portion -- of Catholic theology and practices stem from sacred tradition as opposed to scripture. That is an eternal sore point with many Protestant denominations, but let's face it: Even a church that goes strictly "by the book" (i.e., the Bible), is basing its foundation on a product that was assembled by flawed human beings over the period of many decades, with the inevitable politics and self-serving agendas coming into play.
Too, scripture has undergone numerous translations: from Hebrew and Aramaic to Greek to old English to modern English... Many believe it was not written to be interpreted literally, as it is chock-full of metaphorical and allegorical prose. And even if it were written in today's English, languages evolve over the centuries, and statements people would have understood 2,000 years ago would often be misconstrued today, just as today's language would befuddle those of Jesus' era. I realize there are plenty of people in the world who interpret the Bible literally, but I certainly am not one of them.
But I digress. My first few paragraphs were intended to convey my respect for the church in which I was raised and still participate. But my nagging doubts about the church -- beginning with the destructive liberation theology of left-wing clergy in South America during the 1970s and 1980s, the callow and gullible actions/statements of Pax Christi and its anti-nuclear arms stance during the Cold War, and continuing through the disgraceful and shameful pedophilia scandal that burst wide open about 15 years ago -- have only intensified of late.
A few years ago, the naive Catholic bishops supported Obamacare as this awful legislation slithered through Congress. Then, after the albatross was enacted into law, the church realized this statist piece of work trampled on First Amendment religious rights (i.e., forcing religious organizations to pay for abortion and contraceptives in health care coverage). DUH! What did you expect? Were you gullible enough to believe the promise of a pathological liar that he would respect your religious rights? This whole affair speaks to the Catholic Church's naivete´ when it comes to the cancerous, odious force of progressive politics and its lead practitioner, President Barack Hussein Obama.
Pope Francis, who has been in office for about 2 1/2 years, has also been naive with regard to the horrendous track record of progressivism. In recent months, he has bashed capitalism, spoken out in favor of income redistribution, and spouted off about the alleged dangers of global warming. Secular, leftist media types, normally antithetical toward the pope and other religious figures, are bowing down to Francis, worshiping and adoring his every word, for the simple reason that he is espousing left-wing policies. Ditto for the Democrats of the U.S. House of Representatives, who are going ga-ga about the upcoming address the pontiff will make to Congress. Let's put it this way: If it had been the more conservative Pope John Paul II, I don't think Nancy Pelosi and her ilk would be so gung-ho.
On top of all of this, it has long irked me that the Vatican is filthy rich with gold, works of art, real estate and other assets. But the church is always pleading for its flock to shell out the money when the collection basket is passed, and complaining about its liabilities. Transparency has never been a strong point, so it is difficult for the average Catholic to know whether his or her contributions are being well-spent. The huge payouts the church accepted to compensate victims of child sexual abuse were substantial, but probably not enough to do serious damage to the financial state of this 2,000-year-old institution.
Far more concerning are A) the untold number of lives that have been shattered and hideously warped by child sexual abuse perpetrated by priests; and B) the utter, appalling arrogance and cruel callousness of bishops who covered up the transgressions of their priests when they learned of their atrocities, and simply sent them on to other parishes to further spread their poison.
Frankly, despite being born and raised a Catholic, I have a lot of anger and disgust toward the Roman Catholic Church. But I also have met many, many excellent priests, deacons, nuns and parishioners whose hearts are undoubtedly in the right place. I recognize that the church is largely a force for good in the world, and appreciate the good things it has done. I am leery of "throwing out the baby with the bath water," as the expression goes.
But, like a troubled marriage, my membership in the Roman Catholic Church is strained. It's a day-by-day thing. Perhaps I should pray about it, but even that might be difficult.
I don't have the answer right now. But I will say that I seriously considered leaving the church when the pedophilia scandal broke, and I haven't ruled out that course of action in the near future. But it's not yet time to decide. I'll wait a while. This is a weighty decision, and the passage of time ought to lend solidity to my verdict.
Recent Comments