In the comments to our post congratulating the Democrats, Troll-in-training Nurglitch made the following allegedy sarcasting prediction:
A lot of campaign rhetoric tends to get overheated, and I certainly hope many of my darker predictions are not realized. However, the gay militancy thing seems to be already in full swing.
What is interesting is that these attacks only started after the recent election. One cause may have been the rejection of homosexual 'marriages' by California voters. Apparently this was a rebuff that the tolerant couldn't tolerate.
I can't help but think that Obama's election also was a factor - in embolding radical leftists to think they could get away with what in any other context would be a hate crime.
What would be the public reaction if, say, a group of loud evangelical Christians infiltrated a gay support group meeting with similar tactics? Or, dare I suggest it, if a bunch of Christians infiltrated a mosque during Friday prayers?
Not only would arrests have taken place on the spot, but the media would go into wall-to-wall coverage about the 'Christianist' threat.
Since he brought it up, I don't think the Dems will force women to have abortions. I do, however, expect them to compel doctors to learn and perform the procedure as a condition of licensure, hospitals will have to support it, and insurers will have to pay for it.
That's one of the great selling points for "universal" (read: government) health care for Democrats - it does an end run around the massive public opposition to taxpayer-funded abortion. You see, if all procedures are funded by the government, and since (to the Dems) abortion is the most important of all civil rights, it absolutely will be a feature of the new regime.
It's going to be an interesting couple of years.
Recent Comments