It is interesting to compare the reactions from various quarters to the recent elections. Hitherto, Democrat defeats were met with cries of "FRAUD!" or "FLEE TO CANADA!" and other hysteria.
The Republican defeat (which is what it was, rather than a Democrat victory) has brought a different reaction from the losing side. There is a sense almost of relief, that at last the ordeal of defending bloated, selfish politicians is over.
The Posse sheds no tears for the GOP on this. They got what they richly deserved.
The Democrats, too, must be aware that the extent of their mandate "such as it is" is fragile and of little consequense on the big issues. Indeed, they know first-hand how effective 49 senators can be at stopping legislation in its tracks.
Was this a rebuke to George W. Bush?
Absolutely, but not in the sense the liberals would prefer.
In 2002 and 2004, Americans were asked to turn out in record numbers, to defy historical trends and give the president the tools he needed to do the job.
The American people responded. They gave him a solid majority of 55 senators, preserved the House and gave Bush a broad mandate to rule.
What did we get in return?
Harriet Myers.
Amnesty for illegal immigrants.
Bureaucratic infighting without parallel, particularly within CIA and the State departments.
Did we get a death tax repeal? A permanent tax cut?
No.
So many people wondered what the point of it all was.
2004 was a referendum on the war and conservatism in general; what we got was Congressional arrogance and administration missteps.
The Posse has said before that we have little good to say about how the White House communications office has handled things. From Bush's Texas Air National Guard record to the whole Scooter Libby/16 words/WMD fiasco, this country deserved a solid and aggressive response to Democrat attacks.
Instead, the White House seemed indifferent to the charges thrown at it, outsourcing its rebuttals to Rush Limbaugh and Hugh Hewitt.
Election night 2006 was the harvest of this bitter crop of tone-deafness and political ineptitude.
Karl Rove outsmarted himself by half on this one. Conservatives still dominate the arena of ideas, but limited government is essential, arguably the essential ingredient in the Republican coalition.
When the GOP bolted on that and began a spending spree, the coalition collapsed.
This brings us to the real winner in all of this.
Republican governors are now fewer and less cocky. Republican legislators chastised and unelectable. John McCain is through.
There is only one prominent GOP member who has not been tainted with this defeat.
Rudy Guiliani.
We have stated before why we like him. The election throws this into even sharper relief.
Contrary to what the editors of National Review think, gay marriage is leaving the national agenda. The states that are going to stop it have done so; those that have not will not.
As a federal issue it is finished. The only thing that remains to be said is for Guiliani to state clearly that it should be decided legislatively, not judicially.
Gun control likewise is a dead issue. The Dems know it, the liberals hate it, but there it is.
Democrat strategists have to know that nominating an anti-gun politician will stir the sleeping giant that is the NRA. The NRA sat out this election. It may not sit out the next one if it has a reason to get involved.
So what two issues remain?
The war.
The budget.
On both of these, Rudy has the goods. He has experience in fighting bloated, inefficient bureaucracies and of course his dedication to the war effort is absolute.
And that will put him over the top.
Recent Comments