You've heard of aphorisms, those adages and pearls of wisdom that offer genuine value and substance.
Well, I've coined a new phrase: Liberalisms. But the definition is different. It does not mean a maxim or adage that is wise and serves everyone well. It just means a simple-minded bromide or cliche that knee-jerk liberals accept as if it were a glass of water. (It's good for you; it's natural; I'm thirsty right now; I'll benefit from this....)
Here are my top three Liberalisms that come to mind: 1) Millions of working class whites of modest income "vote against their interests" when they vote Republican. 2) "We" society rather than "me" society; and 3) Jesus was a liberal.
The first one is easy to explain: In the liberal mind, folks of modest income should fall all over themselves voting for a sugar daddy government that bestows entitlements on them and advocates a so-called "living wage." (Even if that wage is not reflective of labor pool supply and demand, and results in fewer jobs for unskilled workers.)
What the libs forget is that many people with limited education and/or of modest income are conservative socially. They may be born-again Christians, and turned off by the secular, libertine bent of so many Democrats. They may adamantly oppose abortion, and cannot stomach the thought of voting for a party that not only defends "the right to choose," but has many members who defend the barbaric practice of partial birth abortion.
Too, working class folk often believe staunchly in the Second Amendment, and this places most Democrats off limits for them. These are just a few of the reasons; in many cases it might just be that salt-of-the-earth folk who wear jeans and flannel shirts, suck down a few beers while watching football, and are not ashamed to admit that Cracker Barrel is their favorite restaurant, just loathe limousine liberals like Nancy Pelosi and condescending, pompous ivory tower types like the Celebrity-in-Chief.
I could easily turn around No. 1, and say that African Americans, about 95 percent of whom vote for Democrats, are voting against their interests. This is because many black people oppose abortion and homosexuality, and are appalled and disheartened by the wretched schools their children are consigned to if they (the parents) cannot afford private school tuition. Large numbers of urban black parents favor vouchers and charter schools, but Democrat politicians are beholden to the teachers' unions that feed them money. So these hypocrite pols, who send their own children to private schools, keep poor black children trapped in gang- and drug- infested, dangerous, violent schools. Real compassionate, eh?
Moving on to No. 2, this trite expression about a "'we' society, not a 'me' society" is one of those feel-good phrases Michael Moore and his ilk like to utter. These folks assume that anyone who doesn't favor ballooning government and a boatload of entitlements is automatically selfish, self-centered, and wants to stomp on the poor. As my esteemed co-blogger wrote a few years ago in a humorous bit of satire, "Every night I pray to my white Protestant God for war. I spend my spare time trying to figure out how to feed the homeless to the hungry. And I love to pour motor oil onto the ground because I hate the earth."
Well, it just so happens that people who believe in capitalism, who know that competition inspires and motivates people to hustle and make the best of their God-given talent; people who are aware of how capitalism has raised standards of living and led to countless beneficial inventions and scientific breakthroughs....Well, many of these people are extremely generous in giving money to charities, churches, and other organizations striving for the bettermennt of society. Compassion does not have to come from the government to be compassionate. I'd just as soon contribute food to a local food bank and help out with Meals on Wheels (I've done both, many times) than send money to the labyrinth bureaucracy to pay useless paper pushers and have much of it wasted before indirect relief reaches the truly needy.
No. 3, Jesus was a liberal -- Well, in some respects, I guess he was. He was more than willing to thumb his nose at the pompous and self-righteous religious leaders of the day, and associate with tax collectors, prostitutes, and other misfits. He went out of his way to comfort the afflicted, while those whose position was in the higher echelons of Jewish society may have conveniently ignored the suffering downtrodden, perhaps surmising that their suffering and painful fate had something to do with moral shortcomings.
But did Jesus share a political and ideological philsophy with today's moveon.org readers? No! The fact that some people think so is evidence of liberals' ignorance of scripture.
I don't claim to be a theologian, but I've read enough scripture to know that Jesus did not promote premarital sex, and I am quite certain he would oppose abortion -- especially the odious partial birth version. Remember Jesus' statement that even if a man fantasizes about having sex with a woman other than his wife, he's already committed adultery in his heart?
Liberals -- and many conservatives, for that matter -- do not adhere to such a strict standard. Matter of fact, based on my observations of liberal thought and behavior, they would be likely to mock and ridicule someone who stated it's a sin to even have lust in your heart.
Free sex, the pill, condoms, gay sex, abortion, and an overall libertine attitude that debases humans, making them more animal-like; damages self-respect; leads to suffering (AIDS and many types of VD) as well as unwanted pregnancies and abortions; and also cheapens what should be a beautiful act between two loving, respectful partners....I don't think ANY of this jibes with Jesus' message.
I can hear the retort: "Well neither does being an uptight, judgmental, greedy CEO who cheats consumers and destroys the environment and guzzles gas in a hog SUV....blah blah blah.....Yeah, whatever.
Recent Comments